Safer Creations of Stem Cells

The very mention of embryonic stem cells carries unwarranted connotations of immoral manipulation often coupled with naive misunderstanding. Regardless of its current place in the medical realm, new research in the field has led to a technique that could ultimately “sidestep” much of this controversy. By inserting information that “free-floats” within the cell (as opposed to altering its DNA), the new technique allows for direct programming of the desired protein. These “embryonic-like” cells do not require the destruction of embryo’s, and instead may be harvested from as plain of a tissue as skin. This detail alone justifies further inquiry by the simple fact that this form off extraction alleviates a major roadblock in the research of stem cells—government intervention. Despite the technique's promise, extended research is necessary before its implementation into human medical treatments.

With modest hesitancy in my voice I have always been a supporter of such studies so long as the source of the embryo was humane. This breakthrough is of great interest to me because it helps to bypass most of my opposition for religious resistance for the matter and cuts right to the point of helping people. Yes, there is still a morality issue, but where do you draw the line? How is a transplant from a compatible donor any different from a synthesized organ of your own genetic makeup, besides of course, the better overall functionality and acceptance? I believe if something is going to improve the quality of life for an individual, its general practice should be allowed.

http://sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/36881/title/Safer_creation_of_stem_cells_